Trump's Immigration Reversal And The Calley Means Accusations

Harry Mayes joins us for What's on the Cut Sheet, bringing the discussion to Trump's appearance on 60 Minutes. We react to the president's comments about deportation policy, workers in landscaping and hospitality, and the possibility of negotiating legal status for certain immigrants. Nick questions why Trump is contemplating this change after campaigning heavily on immigration enforcement, while Greg argues that voters may support removing violent criminals without supporting the deportation of every longtime worker. We also debate whether immigration truly explains Republican losses in the midterm elections or whether the president is overlooking larger political problems. We continue our argument over Trump's immigration comments, examining the distinction between border security, deportations, legal status, and the economic concerns of American workers. We discuss the effect of immigration enforcement on employers, construction workers, hospitality businesses, and families. Nick questions whether Trump's remarks fit with his campaign promises and the appointment of Stephen Miller, while Greg challenges the assumption that every undocumented worker should face the same outcome. We also question Trump's interpretation of the midterm results and whether his political advisers are providing the correct message about what voters want. The conversation shifts toward a major White House shakeup as Susie Wiles departs her position and Stephen Miller prepares to take over. We examine former adviser Calley Means' appearance on Joe Rogan, where he accuses officials close to Trump of interfering with health policy on behalf of corporate interests. We discuss glyphosate, ultra-processed foods, sugar industry influence, tobacco and vaping policy, and lobbying firms connected to people surrounding the administration. We also consider how the Make America Healthy Again coalition fits into Trump's political base and whether the president has enough control over competing interests within his own administration. We dig into the names and allegations raised by Means, including references to Tony Fabrizio, James Blair, Ballard Partners, and Susie Wiles' daughter. We examine the difference between allegations of corruption and lobbying activity that is legal under existing rules, with Greg challenging how much personal responsibility should fall on Trump. Nick argues that a president who campaigns on changing Washington must answer for the people operating around him. Our discussion includes the timing of the allegations, objections from people named by Means, and the larger question of whether either party is willing to restrict lobbying and financial influence in Washington.