Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark and conference athletic directors recently met to discuss the fallout from a court ruling that restored the eligibility of Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby, a decision that has sparked significant debate across college athletics.
Sorsby, who transferred to Texas Tech after spending time at Indiana and Cincinnati, was previously ruled ineligible by the NCAA for violating sports gambling policies. Court records indicate he placed thousands of wagers totaling roughly $90,000, including bets involving Indiana football while he was a member of the program.
Earlier this week, a Lubbock County judge granted Sorsby a temporary injunction that allows him to play during the 2026 season while his legal challenge against the NCAA proceeds. As part of the ruling, Sorsby must serve a two-game suspension.
The decision has drawn criticism from NCAA leaders and several athletic administrators who argue the ruling undermines the integrity of college sports. Conference officials are reportedly exploring potential responses, while the NCAA has already appealed the injunction.
Sorsby's lawsuit against the NCAA is scheduled for trial in February 2027, meaning he is expected to remain eligible for the upcoming season unless an appeals court overturns the injunction.
