Linda stays with us as we examine what comes next if the Clancy jury stays deadlocked. She explains the high bar for removing a juror, why repeated instructions risk becoming coercive, what a mistrial means for prosecutors and how a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity result can lead to psychiatric commitment rather than prison. She also questions parts of the claimed hallucination defense and considers what prosecutors could change in a second trial.
The conversation expands into the wider implications of the defense before Linda signs off ahead of her later fill-in appearance for Dawn Stensland. After a Crossfade-fueled trip back through MySpace-era rock, we turn to the killing of Bank of America vice president Erin Piacenti in a random Times Square stabbing and condemn reactions that appear to turn her employer into a justification for violence.
