Skip to content

Condition: Post with Page_List

Listen
Search
Please enter at least 3 characters.

Latest Stories

How do you decide who should be the National League MVP when there are three legitimate finalists?

It's a question that many will have to wrestle with in the coming days, so I attempted to simplify it, at least by my standards.


I created a formula -- by no means am I a math expert -- that includes the offensive and defensive statistics that matter the most to me in determining a player's value to attempt to objectively determine a winner:

MVP Score Equation: Slash line (batting average, on-base percentage and slugging percentage each multiplied by 1,000) + home runs + total extra-base hits + walks + RBIs + OPS+ + stolen bases + Defensive Runs Saved + Outs Above Average + fWAR + bWAR = MVP Score

I wasn't sure what results the formula would produce, and didn't deviate from the numbers that it returned.

Additionally, team success -- or lack thereof -- was not considered. It shouldn't be seen a radical idea that you can provide the most value to your team but still not have the necessary supporting cast to contend. None of the three finalists -- Bryce Harper, Fernando Tatis Jr. and Juan Soto -- were on teams that made the playoffs. All three still had excellent seasons.

If I had a National League MVP ballot, here's how the top three spots would play out in it:

LISTEN on the Audacy App
Sign Up and Follow Audacy Sports
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram