The New York Times continues to search for evidence of Russian collusion nearly one year after Robert Mueller's independent investigation found no evidence.
This, while former members of the FBI admit to falsifying reports linking Trump campaign workers to Russia in 2016.
Hans Von Spakovsky said the opinion piece written by the New York Times could have been mistaken for satire from The Onion.
Heritage’s Hans von Spakovksy said the piece that was written about Trump collusion had a lot of innuendoes. They used words like “suggest” and “may have been linked.”
“It’s like watching someone take a fairytale and try to turn it into fact,” he said on the continued narrative that Trump won in 2016 because he colluded with Russia.
He said to keep in mind that Bob Mueller concluded there was no collusion. Also, the Russians concocted the fake Steele dossier.
Check out the article from The New York Times HERE.
