Oakland City Council approves Howard Terminal term sheet amid A's reservations

The Oakland City Council on Tuesday approved an amended term sheet for the Athletics' $12 billion Howard Terminal ballpark project, amid public reservations from team officials.
The Oakland City Council on Tuesday approved an amended term sheet for the Athletics' $12 billion Howard Terminal ballpark project, amid public reservations from team officials. Photo credit Kelley L Cox/USATSI

The Oakland City Council on Tuesday approved an amended term sheet for the Athletics' $12 billion Howard Terminal ballpark project, amid public reservations from team officials.

The city council approved the amended term sheet on a 6-1 vote, with councilmember Noel Gallo voting no and councilmember Carroll Fife abstaining. A's President Dave Kaval said during Tuesday's council meeting the city's term sheet isn't "an effective path forward" to build a $1 billion, 35,000-seat waterfront stadium and keep the team in Oakland after MLB granted the franchise approval to explore relocation earlier this year.

"I think it is important to remember that the current term sheet, even with these amendments, is not something the A's have consensus around," Kaval said. "It's not a term sheet that we proposed, with edits, that we have kind of come together in mutual agreement. And I just really want to stress that voting 'yes' on something that we don’t agree with or don't have consensus around is not an effective path forward."

Council President Nikki Fortunato Bas said the amended term sheet clarifies the city's position and allows for continued negotiations.

"This is an opportunity for Oakland to move forward, to let the A's know what our terms are as a city," Fortunato Bas said prior to the vote.

Under the amended term sheet, city administrators said the A's would not be responsible for nearly $352 million in off-site infrastructure improvements. Project Manager Molly Maybrun said a "historically exceptional time" with California’s budget surplus could help the city cover those costs, and the city would also seek regional and federal funding.

The city's proposed term sheet included one infrastructure financing district rather than the two the A's put forth in their April term sheet. It also called on the A's to build 450 affordable housing units out of the 3,000 the team wants to build at the 55-acre Howard Terminal site, and anti-displacement funding for the four neighborhoods affected by the project: West Oakland, Chinatown, Old Oakland and the Jack London District.

"We believe the A's can, and should, agree with these terms," Assistant City Administrator Betsy Lake said in a presentation of the amended term sheet to the city council.

Although the city council passed the amended term sheet, many council members expressed reservations.

Dan Kalb, who represents District 1, said he was "holding (his) nose" in voting yes. Fortunato Bas, District 7’s Treva Reid and District 6’s Loren Taylor criticized Kaval and the A’s for how they negotiated, identifying the former's social-media posts from visits to Las Vegas as a sore spot.

"The city has moved significantly toward what the A's have asked for and are asking for," Kalb told KCBS Radio's Jim Taylor after the vote. "And for (the A's) or anybody else to suggest that we have farther to move is, really, patently ridiculous. The A's are the ones who need to come back to the table."

Fife, prior to abstaining, said she believed the council was voting on a proposal the A's would turn down. Kaval claimed the team "had not really been privy to or had time to digest" the city council’s amended term sheet.

Vice Mayor Rebecca Kaplan, meanwhile, rebutted that the city had added language "word for word" addressing the team’s main impediment of funding off-site infrastructure.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.