Dana & Parks: Judge rules Subway can be sued over '100% tuna' claim

A scoop of tuna sits next to a tuna sandwich from Subway.
A scoop of tuna sits next to a tuna sandwich from Subway. A recent lab analysis of tuna used in Subway sandwiches commissioned by the New York Times did not reveal any tuna DNA in samples taken from Subway tuna sandwiches. The lab was unable to pinpoint a species in the tuna samples from three Los Angeles area Subway sandwich shops. Photo credit Getty Images

Earlier this week, Dana & Parks shared a story about a woman being sued for $250,000 for feeding ducks in her neighborhood.

If you thought that lawsuit perhaps a tad foolish, here's another one for you:
A federal judge is allowing a woman to file a lawsuit against Subway after she says the restaurant chain misled her by claiming their sandwiches contain "100% tuna."

Podcast Episode
The Dana & Parks Podcast
D&P Highlight: 'We've got problems people...a TUNA SANDWICH AIN'T IT!'
Listen Now
Now Playing
Now Playing

For more, stream KMBZ now.

Subway sought to dismiss the lawsuit, which claims lab testing shows the tuna contains animal products such as chicken, pork and cattle, but a judge determined the case should move forward.

Dana & Parks wonder, is this really what we need to be spending our time on?

Catch the Dana & Parks Podcast and listen whenever you want.

Featured Image Photo Credit: Getty Images