LOS ANGELES (CNS) - A judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by a Bel-Air synagogue that alleged the 2017 Skirball Fire that damaged the house of worship started in a homeless encampment that local and state officials failed to inspect or warn of its existence.
Want to get caught up on what's happening in SoCal every weekday afternoon? Click to follow The L.A. Local wherever you get podcasts.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Kenneth R. Freeman issued his ruling Tuesday regarding the dismissal motions brought by the city of Los Angeles and the state. The judge held two hearings for arguments in November, then took the case under submission.
The Leo Baeck Temple, two individuals and Ace American Insurance Co., which paid clients for property damaged in the fire, were plaintiffs in the suit filed in November 2018. The blaze damaged the synagogue as it swept through the hills of Bel-Air on Dec. 6, 2017.
The fire destroyed six homes and damaged a dozen others. The Los Angeles Fire Department initially stated that the source of the blaze was a cooking fire that broke out at an encampment nearby.
But in their court papers urging dismissal of the city as a defendant, lawyers for the City Attorney's Office stated that a senior Los Angeles Fire Department arson investigator concluded in April 2018 that the fire originated north of the homeless encampment that was initially under investigation, on the west-facing mountainside adjacent to the northbound San Diego (405) Freeway, and that the fire's cause was undetermined.
The city does not own the land where the fire actually began and has no authority to maintain it, the City Attorney's lawyers further maintained.
Similarly, attorneys for the state, on behalf of the SMMC and Caltrans, argued in their court papers regarding the claims against those entities that two eyewitness to the earliest flames of the Skirball Fire testified that they observed those flames at an area six-tenths of a mile north of the homeless encampment and did not see flames in the encampment's vicinity.
Their recollections have been verified by time-stamped photographs and a video clip, and are also corroborated by the earliest 911 calls, the SMMC lawyers further stated in their court papers.
The SMMC did not create the allegedly dangerous condition and its members did not know of its existence, conservancy lawyers state in their court papers.
An erroneous media report, feeding upon fears about the homeless population, that the fire possibly started in the encampment was debunked by the LAFD's arson investigation report, according to the SMMC attorneys, who further stated that the lawsuit "should never have been filed."
But in their lawsuit, temple leaders said the city received multiple complaints about the encampment, which was situated among dry brush and flammable vegetation, but failed to inspect or warn the public about the dangerous condition.
The city "knew or should have known that this presented a fire hazard, as the area is prone to wildfires because of the trees, bushes and other vegetation and foliage," the lawsuit stated.
The encampment was nestled in a canyon several hundred feet from Sepulveda Boulevard and the 405 Freeway, hidden from passing cars. Officials have said it was home to an unknown number of people for several years.
The camp -- one of scores of makeshift communities that have grown along freeways, rivers and open space across Los Angeles -- was largely destroyed in the fire.
The plaintiffs dropped Los Angeles County as a defendant in the case in August 2022.
Follow KNX News 97.1 FM
Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | TikTok
