A new peer-reviewed study finds that apocalyptic thinking has moved well out of the fringe - with roughly one in three Americans saying they expect the world to end within their own lifetime, and those beliefs quietly shaping how people respond to some of the biggest challenges facing humanity.
The findings, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, are drawn from surveys of more than 3,400 people across the United States and Canada. In the American sample alone - 1,409 respondents - nearly a third said they believe the world will end within their lifetime.
Researchers found that the people surveyed imagined the apocalypse in a wide variety of ways, with significant differences in what could trigger the end of days - and even in whether such an ending might ultimately be a good thing.
The study goes beyond simple yes-or-no questions about doomsday, finding that what people believe about the apocalypse - when it will happen, who controls it, and what comes after - can dramatically shape their attitudes toward issues ranging from climate change and pandemic response to nuclear conflict and emerging technologies.
"Belief in the end of the world is surprisingly common across North America, and it's significantly influencing how people interpret and respond to the most pressing threats facing humanity," said Dr. Matthew Billet, the study's lead author, who conducted the research as a PhD candidate at the University of British Columbia and is now a postdoctoral scholar at the University of California, Irvine.
The study identified five key dimensions shaping how people think about the end of the world, including how soon it might arrive and whether humans or divine forces are responsible. Those distinctions have real-world consequences.
People who believed the end is near and that humans are causing it perceived greater risk and were more likely to support extreme action to address threats. Those who believed divine forces control the apocalypse, however, were less likely to support preventive measures.
Billet explained the stakes plainly: "Someone who believes humans are causing the apocalypse through climate change will respond very differently to environmental policy than someone who believes the end times are controlled by divine prophecy."
The research also found notable differences across religious denominations, though one theme held across all groups. "Everyone agrees on one thing: we humans play an important role in the fate of our species," Billet said. "This was as true for the religious as it was for the non-religious."
Researchers noted that apocalyptic alarm didn't automatically produce passivity - in some cases, people who expected the end soon actually supported stronger interventions, particularly when they believed human actions were driving it.
LISTEN on the Audacy App
Tell your Smart Speaker to "PLAY 1080 KRLD"
Sign Up to receive our KRLD Insider Newsletter for more news
Follow us on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube