Who should win the NL MVP? Ranking the 3 finalists in a razor-thin race
How do you decide who should be the National League MVP when there are three legitimate finalists?
It's a question that many will have to wrestle with in the coming days, so I attempted to simplify it, at least by my standards.

I created a formula -- by no means am I a math expert -- that includes the offensive and defensive statistics that matter the most to me in determining a player's value to attempt to objectively determine a winner:
MVP Score Equation: Slash line (batting average, on-base percentage and slugging percentage each multiplied by 1,000) + home runs + total extra-base hits + walks + RBIs + OPS+ + stolen bases + Defensive Runs Saved + Outs Above Average + fWAR + bWAR = MVP Score
I wasn't sure what results the formula would produce, and didn't deviate from the numbers that it returned.
Additionally, team success -- or lack thereof -- was not considered. It shouldn't be seen a radical idea that you can provide the most value to your team but still not have the necessary supporting cast to contend. None of the three finalists -- Bryce Harper, Fernando Tatis Jr. and Juan Soto -- were on teams that made the playoffs. All three still had excellent seasons.
If I had a National League MVP ballot, here's how the top three spots would play out in it: