Ahead of potential AFC Championship in Atlanta, will all conference title games eventually be held at neutral sites?

A total of 50,000 tickets were sold for the game in a 24-hour span
75756A5E-120A-4932-810C-2FD980DB785E

(Audacy Sports/WGR 550) - Within a 24-hour span earlier this week, over 50,000 tickets were sold for a potential neutral-site AFC Championship Game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta.

Of course, that would only come to fruition if the teams playing are the Buffalo Bills and Kansas City Chiefs, needing wins over the Cincinnati Bengals and Jacksonville Jaguars, respectively, to advance to next week’s conference title game.

Live On-Air
Ask Your Smart Speaker to Play W G R 5 50
WGR 550 SportsRadio
Listen Now
Now Playing
Now Playing

This would come as a peace offering to the Bills, who finished with a lower winning percentage than the Chiefs, but also played one fewer game. That came after their Week 17 matchup with the Bengals was never resumed in Cincinnati due to a medical emergency with Bills safety Damar Hamlin.

This contingency plan obviously came under unprecedented circumstances, though, as evidenced by what’s been described as “extraordinary demand,” the novelty of a neutral-site conference championship has fans intrigued.

While next week’s game, if it’s held in Atlanta, could prove to be an outlier, Cleveland Browns beat reporter Daryl Ruiter of 92.3 The Fan theorized that the NFL could be launching this as a trial balloon of sorts, an experiment to determine the feasibility of making this an annual occurrence.

It's hard not to be cynical about the NFL and its ulterior motives, somehow spinning an unconscionable tragedy (a player almost dying on the field) into a clever marketing ploy. We all know capitalism never sleeps, and if the NFL can make a neutral-site semifinal game in Atlanta profitable - touting Bills-Chiefs as a mini-Super Bowl between two of the league’s elite quarterbacks (Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes) - why wouldn’t they?

Just think of the untapped potential, having cities and stadiums jockey for hosting bids with networks waging a similar battle for broadcast rights. Wherever he is, commissioner Roger Goodell must be kicking himself right now, furious he didn’t think of this sooner.

It seems almost inevitable, a foregone conclusion for a league that, for all its corruption and moral compromises, continues to make money hand over fist, expertly mining new revenue sources for enormous profit.

Of course, not everyone will be on board with neutral-site conference championships. While the Super Bowl may reign supreme as an unmatched entertainment spectacle and a touchstone of American pop culture, it’s far from the best fan atmosphere, a neutered, watered-down version of the passion and excitement of a home crowd living and dying by every play.

Perennial contenders like the Chiefs would also cry foul, not only losing the homefield advantage they worked so hard for during the regular season, but also forfeiting millions in ticket revenue, merchandise, parking and stadium concessions, not to mention how highly-anticipated playoff games impact the local economy (hotels, restaurants, etc.).

Traditionalists would hate it with every fiber of their being, but when has that ever stopped the NFL from making a buck? The reality is, it doesn’t much matter, because wherever the NFL goes, whether it’s staging a Thursday night game on Amazon or a 9:30 a.m. EST kickoff in London, money is sure to follow.

Podcast Episode
One Bills Live
How can the Bills win on Sunday?
Listen Now
Now Playing
Now Playing

LISTEN on the Audacy App
Sign Up and Follow Audacy Sports
Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Featured Image Photo Credit: Justin Heiman - Getty Images