'No Useable Power': 8 MLB Stars Who Were Severely Underrated on Scouting Reports
Sometimes, you just know.
Scouting in any sport is no easy task. But it’s not especially hard when a guy like Ken Griffey Jr. starts to emerge as a prospect. His immense talent was quite apparent from a very young age, and having a three-time All-Star outfielder as a father definitely doesn’t hurt.
Scouts flocked to Archbishop Moeller High School in the mid-1980s to watch the insanely athletic kid play ball, knowing as soon as they laid their eyes on him that they were potentially witnessing greatness. Some of them had been to the campus before, perhaps to watch 1982 high school senior Barry Larkin on a similarly pleasing scouting trip.
San Francisco Giants scout George Genovese came to Archbishop Mueller to watch Griffey in the summer of 1986, comparing him to Darryl Strawberry and considering him a potential top-round choice if he continued to develop. Seattle Mariners scout Bob Harrison agreed, calling him the “type that could hit 30 (home runs) a season some day.” Not bad for a rising junior in high school. But not as high as others would go.
Roger Jongewaard, a scout for the Seattle Mariners, lauded the high schooler for his “rare combination of speed/power/instincts.” On top of that, he said he made the game look easy and had superstar potential. His comparison? Barry Bonds, but “much better… at (the) same stage.” Jongewaard’s only knock was Griffey’s immaturity, which isn’t much of a knock considering he went on to be known as “The Kid.”
At just 17 years old, scouts knew what they saw in Griffey, and they were right on. But the same isn’t the case for other players. Several of the league’s biggest stars were severely underestimated as revealed by shocking scouting reports that are part of the National Baseball Hall of Fame’s massive digital collection. All of the scouting reports used in this piece were pulled from the archive of over 3,600 documents. Of course, the sample scouting reports we used are the ones that are particularly negative, and we definitely don’t intend to say that all scouts viewed these players in the same light.
Let’s see who some scouts missed the mark on, causing teams to pay in hindsight.
For reference, scouts use a 20 to 80 scale to grade players’ attributes. According to MLB.com, 20-30 is well below average, 40 is below average, 50 is average, 60 is above average, and 70-80 is well above average. Notable scouting report lines bolded for effect.