The man who hopes to be President Donald Trump’s health secretary repeatedly asked to see “data” or “science” showing vaccines are safe – but when an influential Republican senator showed him evidence, he dismissed it.
Want to get caught up on what's happening in SoCal every weekday afternoon? Click to follow The L.A. Local wherever you get podcasts.
Dr. Osterholm, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) at the University of Minnesota, and has worked under both Democratic and Republican governors and presidents over his distinguished career. He told WCCO's Adam and Jordana that Kennedy is not fit for the position.
"There is no one who's probably less qualified to be Secretary of Health and Human Services than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.," Osterholm said Friday. "And I say that because this is a man who on his very character is challenged to be the secretary. I say that because if you look at anything he's ever said, the next day he'll say something different. He's one of the few people I know that thinks that the fact that you have something on an audio-visual tape, of him saying something, and he can deny it and he never said it. I mean, it's pretty hard to dismiss things like that."
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spent two days this week insisting to senators that he’s not anti-vaccine. He said that he instead supports vaccinations and will follow the science in overseeing the $1.7 trillion Department of Health and Human Services, which, among other duties, oversees vaccine research, approval and recommendations.
But Kennedy repeatedly refused to acknowledge scientific consensus that childhood vaccines don’t cause autism and that COVID-19 vaccines saved millions of lives, and he falsely asserted the government has no good vaccine safety monitoring. While appearing to ignore mainstream science, he cited flawed or tangential research to make his points, such as suggesting Black people may need different vaccines than whites.
"He does not understand the issues around vaccines," claims Osterholm. "He doesn't understand much about Medicare and Medicaid, it came out very clearly in the hearing. Here's a man who is now involved in litigation against one of the vaccines that has been a lifesaver for many, the Gardasil vaccine against HPV, which is right now saving probably 20,000 to 25,000 lives a year who are not getting cervical cancer."
His responses raised concern among health experts that Kennedy lacks basic skills needed for the job.
“He ignores science. He cherry-picks sometimes fraudulent studies. Sometimes he takes well-done studies and takes little pieces of them out of context,” said Dr. Sean O’Leary of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
He worries that Kennedy could further damage public confidence in vaccines and “we will see return of diseases that we really haven’t seen much of and unfortunately children will suffer.”
Kennedy “in many ways demonstrated his lack of capacity to really understand some details around science and evidence that I think he would really need to know,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin of the American Public Health Association.
"He continues to come back and flood the zone with, 'well, if we just had safety studies, let me look at him.' Well, he has no expertise or criteria to look at these studies," Osterholm told WCCO Radio. "And the fact of the matter is, they have been exhaustive in number and exhaustive in review. I would just say that of all the events I've been involved with, in a nonpartisan way in 50 years, this one with him, should he become Secretary of Health and Human Services, is by far the most disastrous."
The science on vaccines is clear to doctors and scientists — but not to Kennedy
Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican and physician, said the science is clear that measles and other childhood vaccines are safe and not linked to autism.
Kennedy said if shown the data he would recommend those vaccines and “not only will I do that but I will apologize for any statements that misled people otherwise.”
So Cassidy pulled out and read aloud definitive scientific conclusions that vaccines don’t cause autism. Kennedy rebuffed him, instead mentioning a recent paper that outside experts have called fundamentally flawed — and Cassidy agreed “has some issues” – in an attempt to counter decades of rigorous studies.
The senator told Kennedy his history of “undermining confidence in vaccines with unfounded or misleading arguments concerns me” – and risks casting “a shadow over President Trump’s legacy” if people die of vaccine-preventable diseases should he become health secretary.
Sen. Maggie Hassan, a Democrat from New Hampshire, said there’s a real-world ramification for “re-litigating and churning settled science” – diverting money and time that could be spent finding the real cause of autism.
Kennedy ignored science showing COVID-19 vaccines saved millions of lives
Kennedy claimed there's no good surveillance system to know that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and lifesaving.
The U.S. tracks vaccine safety through multiple monitoring systems including electronic medical records from a list of health systems. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also checks how vaccines fare internationally, such as during the pandemic when large databases from Israel and the U.K. helped reinforce that the new mRNA vaccines were safe and lowering deaths from the coronavirus.
“You’re applying for the job — clearly you should know this," said Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. “The scientific community has established that COVID vaccines saved millions of lives and you’re casting doubt.”
Kennedy declines to back a vaccine that prevents cancer in women
AAP's O'Leary said there are about 35,000 cases of cancer related to the HPV virus that could be prevented by that vaccine, including 4,000 deaths per year. “We are already seeing decreases in the number of cases of HPV-related cancers as a result of HPV vaccination.”
Kennedy didn't answer directly when asked if he stood by claims that the HPV vaccine could cause cancer or other disease. He instead brought up a pending lawsuit and suggested a jury — of non-scientists — would decide.
Kennedy's unfounded comment about race and vaccine schedules
Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, a Maryland Democrat, asked Kennedy about prior comments that Black people might need a different vaccination schedule than whites. Alsobrooks, who is Black, asked how Kennedy thought she should have been vaccinated differently.
Kennedy referred to some earlier papers suggesting people of African-American ancestry had a stronger immune response to measles and rubella vaccines than white people.
Vaccination recommendations aren’t based on race but on biological factors such as someone’s age and risk of a specific disease. Some studies show Black Americans are more hesitant than whites to receive certain vaccines.
“That is so dangerous,” Alsobrooks told Kennedy.
“There’s no evidence that there needs to be a different vaccine schedule based on race,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. Such statements could make different populations wrongly believe “well, maybe I don’t need as many vaccines” as are recommended.
Follow KNX News 97.1 FM
Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | TikTok