Skip to content

Condition: Post with Page_List

Listen
Search
Please enter at least 3 characters.

Latest Stories

Judge tells Sofía Vergara’s former fiancé to clarify damages sought

Sofía Vergara attends the "America's Got Talent" Season 17 Kick-Off Red Carpet at Pasadena Civic Auditorium on April 20, 2022 in Pasadena, California.
Sofía Vergara attends the "America's Got Talent" Season 17 Kick-Off Red Carpet at Pasadena Civic Auditorium on April 20, 2022 in Pasadena, California.
Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images

LOS ANGELES (CNS) - A judge today said he will order Sofia Vergara's former fiance -- who sued the Beverly Hills reproductive center where the ex- couple had embryos created in anticipation of having a family -- to answer further deposition questions from the facility's attorneys unless the plaintiff agrees to clarify the nature of the damages he seeks.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Stephen I.Goorvitch said during a hearing Monday that businessman/actor Nick Loeb can avoid sitting for the additional inquiries from lawyers for ART Reproductive Services LLC if he and his lawyer, Vip Bhola, sign an agreement stating that Loeb does not seek damages from the emotional distress of not being able to have a relationship with the unborn children.


Bhola told the judge his client only wants damages related to legal fees and the ongoing litigation with Vergara, which has involved additional lawsuits. But Goorvitch said that stance was unclear in Bhola's court papers and that he understood why the reproductive center brought the motion. In his tentative ruling issued Friday, the judge said he was leaning toward granting the defense motion.

Goorvitch told Bhola that the signed agreement by the attorney and Loeb, if filed, will preclude Loeb from seeking damages related to his inability to have relationship with the unborn children.

"You can't come in later and say you're seeking this," Goorvitch said.

Goorvitch took under submission the part of his tentative ruling regarding a $2,110 fine he said he was thinking of imposing because Bhola allegedly told Loeb during the first deposition to not answer some defense questions.

In the negligence suit filed in June 2020, Loeb says he and Vergara began their relationship in 2010, became engaged in 2012 and subsequently started discussing plans to have a family. They agreed to create embryos at ART through in-vitro fertilization, according to his court papers.

After the first round of IVF, a surrogate mother was unable to produce a child with two embryos, so Loeb and Vergara consulted with ART about a second round of treatments in November 2013 that produced two more embryos, according to Loeb.

However, the ART form directive did not provide Loeb and Vergara with the chance to decide what would happen to the embryos if the couple separated or if storage fees went unpaid, a violation of the state Health & Safety Code, according to Loeb.

Vergara failed to pay the storage fees and Loeb ended up paying them, he says.

Loeb and Vergara also were not provided legal counsel or advised to speak to lawyers before signing the forms, according to Loeb.

The ART Center's attorneys wanted to ask Loeb questions during his deposition about his living children and his relationship with them, but Loeb's lawyer told him not to answer, according to the judge's tentative ruling.

"That alone compels the court to grant this motion," Goorvitch wrote. "The law is clear that an attorney may not direct a client not to answer a question during the deposition unless it implicates issues such as privilege or trade secret."

Among the questions the facility's lawyers wanted to ask Loeb were how often he sees his children in person, who is their biological mother, who has legal custody of them, does he have a visitation schedule set with them, what are their genders, and was Loeb present for their birthdays and school performances.

Bhola said all of Loeb's children are very young. In his court papers, Bhola, stated that, given that Loeb has received death threats because of his pro-life beliefs and Vergara's popularity, "He is not going to subject his living children to that risk."

In one of the separate legal actions between Vergara and Loeb, the actresss, now 49, sued Loeb in February 2016, seeking a court order declaring that any attempts by Loeb, now 46, to bring the embryos to term would be a breach of their original contract. Vergara won that case in March 2021.

Follow KNX News 97.1 FM
Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | TikTok