
(WWJ) Democratic state lawmaker have announced their rebuttal today to the GOP plan on reforming no fault auto insurance.
What they're calling "the D.R.I.V.E. plan" delivers what they say is the first holistic approach to Michigan’s auto insurance system by Delivering Reduced Insurance Rates and Value to Every Michigander.
Michigan’s auto insurance industry is one of the least regulated in the U.S. with Michigan drivers paying nearly two times more than drivers anywhere else in the nation, according to a University of Michigan study; and Democrats’ D.R.I.V.E. plan tackles those rates by requiring a 40% rate reduction on the total bill, increasing consumer protections and ending discriminatory rate-setting practices like red-lining.
Meanwhile, GOP-backed legislation pending on the House floor does not include crucial protections for drivers that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has called for. Those include a mandatory price reduction for drivers, plus removing zip code or credit score as factors in the price.
The question is, does either plan have a chance to pass?
WWJ Lansing Bureau Chief Tim Skubick says there's hope with talks going on behind the scenes to find a middle ground.
"This is a major development in the sense that if you're talking, there is always the chance of a deal," he reported, Thursday afternoon. "There's no guarantee, but the two Republican leaders appear to be all in on sitting down with the governor and once and for all finding solutions on cost savings for Michigan motorists."
"They aren't there yet," Skubick added, "but this is a major, major step in that direction."
Under the current no-fault system, Michigan has the highest auto insurance rates in the nation -- about $2,400 per year on average, which is nearly $1,000 above the national average. Michigan is also the only state that requires seniors to buy duplicative coverage, costing them between $600 and $1,000 each year.
The Senate last week voted 24 to 12 in favor of legislation that would eliminate a requirement that drivers buy unlimited medical benefits to cover crash injuries. But it doesn't go far enough for Whitmer and her fellow Democrats.
Skubick said only two Democrats sided with Republicans who led the Senate plan.
"Here was the major dispute: The Democrats voted no for the most part because they said there was no guarantee that there would be any savings for any motorists in the state under this so-called reform plan," Skubick reported.
---------------------