Who should win the NL MVP? Ranking the 4 candidates in a razor-thin race
How do you decide who should be the National League MVP when there are four legitimate candidates?
It's a question that many will have to wrestle with in the coming weeks, so I attempted to simplify it, at least by my standards.

I created a formula -- by no means am I a math expert -- that includes the offensive and defensive statistics that matter the most to me in determining a player's value to attempt to objectively determine a winner:
MVP Score Equation: Slash line (batting average, on-base percentage and slugging percentage each multiplied by 1,000) + home runs + total extra-base hits + walks + RBIs + OPS+ + stolen bases + Defensive Runs Saved + Outs Above Average + fWAR + bWAR = MVP Score
I wasn't sure what results the formula would produce, and didn't deviate from the numbers that it returned.
Additionally, team success -- or lack thereof -- was not considered. It shouldn't be seen a radical idea that you can provide the most value to your team but still not have the necessary supporting cast to contend. Additionally, Trea Turner's July trade from the Washington Nationals to the Los Angeles Dodgers was not held against him, nor was it held against Juan Soto, who became the only star in his own lineup once Turner was traded away.
If I had a National League MVP ballot, here's how the top four would play out in it: